Showing posts with label scmr. Show all posts
Showing posts with label scmr. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 5, 2007

Earnings Perspective: Sycamore Networks – Market’s Reaction Seems Backwards

On Wednesday, September 5, 2007, before the opening bell, Sycamore Networks (NASDAQ: SCMR) reported their financial results for the 4th Quarter and Fiscal Year Ended 2007 financial results. The markets were not pleased with the results and it sent SCMR down nearly 8% to close at $3.73. SCMR also missed analyst expectations. The markets were expecting $0.03 EPS for Q4 2007 and $46M in revenue for the same period. SCMR came in at $0.02 EPS and $38M of revenue, respectively. To seemingly make matters worse, SCMR’s Vice President of Finance and Administration stepped down. Sounds like things are falling apart at the Chelmsford, MA based manufacturer of networking hardware and equipment.

Certainly, it could be the case and SCMR could be falling apart and is dead in the water, but I want to point out some observations which suggest to me, that at the very least, SCMR is not going away.

First, since it is a short issue, as for missing analyst expectations, well, really, there is only one analyst – so, what do you expect? While it is no fun to show-off a missed quarter, one estimate – the miss does not carry a great deal of weight.

Regarding the department of the company’s finance chief, the negativity surrounding this event appears to be exaggerated. Certainly, the CFO leaving can easily be interpreted as a red flag, but it certainly does not appear that Mr. Gaynor left on bad terms. Per the conference call, Mr. Gaynor will remain with SCMR for the remainder of the month before pursuing another employment opportunity. He was not fired and it certainly seems that he did not smell a rat, as if he did, he likely would not hang around for the rest of the month. As a shareholder, you never like to see any member of your key management leave, often times, it is just the natural course of things. SCMR should be able to find a competent replacement. The headlines reading “CFO Steps Down” or “Resigns” are technically true, but imply that there is some form of accounting scandal about to come out. This can happen, as anything is possible, but per the nature of his departure, at worst, it is a neutral event.

A big element that has attracted much attention to SCMR over the past few months has been their enormous cash and cash equivalents stash, which grew to $925M from the $904M since the close of Q3 2007. This nearly $1 billion balance translates into about $3.27/share of cash, or about 88% of SCMR’s market value per their September 5, 2007 closing price. SCMR has no debt, either. Although not the ideal way to do it, SCMR continues to produce positive cash (albeit, the huge interest income makes that possible) and this provides a certain baseline to the stock price, which it seems we are close to it at these levels.

A big knock on SCMR has been their inability to produce positive cash flow from operations. Q4 2007 was no exception with a non-GAAP loss from operations of about $5.3M and an operating loss of $19.3M for FYE 2007. Again, the interest on the cash hoard has enabled SCMR to show non-GAAP income from operations. There is little discussion of the revenue growth SCMR has demonstrated the past 12 months. Granted, and SCMR blatantly acknowledges such, that the revenue growth is a result of an acquisition completed in Q1 2007. The growth is not staggering by any means, but showed 133% increase in revenue in Q4 2007 vs. Q4 2007 and 79% revenue growth when you compare the same two periods to each other. This trend, per SCMR’s numbers, appears to be sustainable and the conference call suggests the revenue growth will continue. So, here we have SCMR – showing strong revenue growth and not burning through cash to do so. That is no small accomplishment and does appear to have been ignored by the rest of the world at this stage. Consider an extreme example in XM Satellite Radio which has seen huge revenue growth, but has yet to show an operational profit. However, since they are growing – it is ok to take on debt and post operating losses. SCMR may be being a little too conservative, but imagine being able to have triple digit revenue growth, post very natural (and often widely expected) operational losses for showing revenue growth, and be able to add cash to your bank account – all without taking out loans or debt.

Another noteworthy item, which is not a big secret, is that only a few months ago, SCMR finally cleared up their stock-option backdating situation. SCMR announced that there would be some additional GSA and restructuring charges associated with the completion of the investigation and some subsequent housekeeping. SCMR clearly warned that Q4 2007 would include some additional expenses related to some of these activities. Starting fresh in Q1 2008, the GAAP financial implications of the past should, well, be a thing of the past.

Now, in the words of Yogi Berra, when you come to a fork in the road, you have to take it. That is where SCMR is at now. The healthy balance sheet and revenue growth are very attractive as is SCMR’s exposure to providing equipment to the cable companies and MSOs to service the flexible bandwidth needs of the high speed Internet and digital phone services. However, as everyone knows, SCMR has been unable to show any form of operating profit the past several years. The pieces are in place for SCMR to turn the corner and should they show an operating profit, which I believe they will in Q2 or Q3 2008 (or perhaps Q1 2008), the company’s stock price should respond very positively and very quickly.

Now obviously, SCMR needs to perform and unfortunately, some of the executive’s answers during the conference call were somewhat vague and perhaps indicate a disinterest or mild incompetence to really make this thing go.

However, even if the above is the case, SCMR is now trading where it was when it was showing less revenue growth, had less cash in the bank, and was mired in non-compliance and options back-dating issues. It would suggest that the pieces (cash, revenue growth, industry with demand) are in place for SCMR to be a potential 2x-5x bagger over the next 12-24 months. Now, granted, that may not happen and it absolutely is a gamble – but what’s the downside? Considering you are basically buying the stock at a slight premium to book value (with over 90% of that book value being in greenbacks), this looks like a win or no-lose scenario. I used today’s dip to increase my holdings by 17%.

Friday, May 25, 2007

What to Buy? New Stock Picks from INFT Winnings

1. SEB - More at $2,230
2. ASHG - More at $236
3. WNC - More at $14.10
4. SCMR - Buy at $3.68
5. GNCI - Buy at $9.05
6. TGIS - Buy at $11.00

For anyone that actively and soundly invests (or even speculates) to build wealth has heard in passing: "The stock market is just like gambling." Initially, it is easy to defensively respond to statements with some resentment, but the reality is, there are many similarities. Anything can happen, as we can see. Unexpected buyouts, miracle turnarounds, indictments of fraud coming out of nowhere – and those all play into the gambling game of the stock market. Conversely, some sports gamblers or casino gamblers will actually claim that they can research the field and find hidden value the same way that investors claim they can do the same.

I have found, however, that what separates an investor from a gambler – whether it be the stock market or a sports game – is that the investor not only makes educated decisions with sound rationale, but also has an above average success rate in coming out on top (whether it be finding a winner, cutting losers before they become total wipe outs, etc.). More importantly, the investor will take the proceeds from a win and then promptly re-invest in another position, rather than spending the money. Sports and financial 'gamblers' alike will brag about their wins, take all of the money from the wins and spend it. Short and simple, no wealth is built as all gains are disbursed out and losses, which do happen, way hard on the total performance.

My point is that I consider myself an investor and on the heels of the $4.25 buy out offer on Inforte (NASDAQ: INFT), I am taking my gains and re-investing. With the markets at all time highs, everything seems expensive, and it is hard to find value. I hate to sound fearful or bearish, but the comments from Alan Greenspan about a strong chance of us hitting recession, the recent housing data announcement making an interest rate cut unlikely, and seeing margin debt rise to levels higher than just before the 2001 market down-turn have me a little concerned about lofty valuations. Regardless, rather than sacrificing my gains to consumerism, here is the hand I will be playing next.

First, oldies but goodies.

Seaboard Corporation (AMEX: SEB)
Seaboard has had an amazing run the past several months, doubling from its Fall, 2006 lows. Back then, this one was a no-brainer, but now take a little more resolve. Seaboard has seen strong growth in its containerized cargo shipping division the past couple of years and there is no doubt that this sector has been hot. Seaboard continues to make strong capital investments in this unit and continues to maintain the efficacy of its other business lines. Off nearly 18% from its all-time high, I felt this was a good entry point to add to my position. At the close of trading on May 24, 2007, Seaboard was trading at less than 11x trailing earnings, 2.1x book value, and at less than 1.9x forward 12 months book value. An owner-friendly investment that retains much of their cash flow to fund their 20% return on equity business. I added to my position at $2,235 and I have a price target of $2,700-$2,900 per share.

Ash Grove Cement (Pink Sheets: ASHG)
Yes, this company trades on the Pink Sheets, which I know nobody really likes, but they are the 5th largest cement company in the USA and the largest American owned cement company in the country. Ash Grove Cement has committed $190M to increase capacity in its Arkansas cement plant by 70% and $250M to build only the 2nd cement plant in the state of Nevada. Ash Grove will also commit another $60M or so in 2007 to expand their cement capacity. I feel strongly that being the largest American owned cement plant will be critical in the future as cement demand increases not only domestically, but worldwide. With the growth of cement internationally expected to outpace growth in the USA over the coming years, I believe many of the international players will invest in foreign production and capacity. Of course, I would, too, but this puts the largest American player in a good position, and with the capacity, to become a more important supplier to meet the USA's substantial domestic need. Granted, I am not the cement company expert, but I do believe that the domestic vs. foreign demand issue has been somewhat overlooked. I first started my position in the Summer, 2005 at $160 per share and since then, have seen the stock rise $47% and seen the annual dividend increase by 10%. Going back further, the stock has done even better in terms of raising the dividend and providing appreciation to its owners. With the spread at $235 x $269, I have an order in to buy at $236. However, with the stock so thinly traded, I am not expecting a quick fill. Historically, I have watched the spread widen around dividend time – next ex-date is June 6, 2007 – and do expect offer price to come down post-dividend. Unfortunately, I have found on this one that if you want in, sometimes you just have to buy at the ask. It's no fun, but historically, I am glad I have done so. I do believe that upside exists to the $300-$320 range, but especially since the company does not announce financial results and is so thinly traded, patience is certainly a virtue.

Wabash National (NYSE: WNC)
One of my losers thus far, but there is value here. It will likely take several months for Wabash to see results show up in the stock price, but I believe it will happen. The stock is likely trading towards the lower end of its range and should be buoyed by the company's buy back program and some big purchases by 14% holder and heralded value/contrarian/cyclical investor, Tontine Capital Partners. The limited downside from here inclines me to add more to my position - but I will wait a little longer as the stock is up 2.8% today to $14.58 in relatively light volume. I have a target of $19-$23 and I expect Wabash to hit that in the next 12-18 months as the market for their products turns around in late 2007/early 2008, they show stronger margins in the face of growth due to their new ERP system, and see the nearly 4M shares short be forced to cover. In the meantime, this might be a long ride as the general sentiment about the industry is overwhelming negative.

New finds include:

Sycamore Networks (NASDAQ: SCMR)
This has been a storied stock its entire life on the NASDAQ. Unfortunately, it has not been a good story for most investors. The company makes networking hardware and equipment, which certainly is not very exciting and has much negativity surrounding it. Sycamore is currently delinquent in its SEC filings due to the notorious options back-dating situation. Such scandal is never a good thing from the appearance of things, but will have no cash impacts on their books. Sycamore currently has about $915M in cash, or about $3.28 per share. That is about 90% of their current market cap of just over $1B. More importantly, Sycamore has shown signs of life and reported a nearly 100% increase in sales, primarily due to an acquisition. I like the cash protecting from downside risk, signs of sales growth, and one of their core products serving the MSO/Cable companies, especially as it pertains to the new digital voice/digital phone service that runs over your cable infrastructure. Comcast, Charter, Cablevision, and Time Warner have all reported strong growth in the digital telephony arena and will need hardware to handle the traffic. Granted, Sycamore competes in a competitive landscape with companies like Cisco in the mix, but I am in at $3.68 with a price target of $4.75-$5.75 in the next 9-12 months – perhaps on an acquisition.

Gencor Industries, Inc. (OTC BB: GNCI)
A small manufacturer of construction equipment and machinery, particularly that serves the highway-construction industry. Gencor also makes equipment that has exposure to the environmental control and synthetic fuel arenas. Gencor is a partner in a joint-venture and receives royalty payments, albeit not material, but growing, for production of synthetic fuels. Gencor is trading near its 52-week low as it enters the historically slower 3rd and 4th quarters. The company is small with only $73M in sales. Gencor has no debt, $52M of cash and cash equivalents, which is about 60% of its market cap, and EV/EBITDA is 1.7. Compare the latter ratio to competitors, such as Astec Industries and its 10.8 EV/EBITDA, and there appears to be some value. Individual investor Lloyd Miller III has bought 72,500 shares since March 22, 2007 and now owns nearly 907,000 shares, which is roughly 10% of the company. A strange ownership structure with Class B shares, small float, and thinly traded status makes it hard to determine where this one could go. $9.05 is a good entry point and I think that Gencor should be trading closer to $16-$18, but its market dynamics may not allow that.

Thomas Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: TGIS)
Thomas Group is a very reputable consulting firm that has no debt, pays a dividend yield of nearly 4%, and is cash flow positive. Ratios, for the most part, show that Thomas Group is not cheap: 2x sales, 6x book value, 11x levered free cash flow. However, this company has a strong track record of success and its P/E is far lower than its peer companies. Only 3M of its 10.8M shares are in the public float, so the stock has the tendency to be volatile – in either direction, of course. The stock is trading a little under $11.00 which I feel is a good entry point. It recently traded as low as $9 in early May, 2007 and traded there in June, 2006 and August, 2006 – and bounced quickly up each time. We have seen a double-top at around $16 twice in 2006, but could we have the triple bottom at $9? Stock stands to get back to $16 and perhaps higher if they continue to show good numbers, but first will need to break through the $12 resistance. This one is more of a technical play than a fundamentals play, but it is likely not going any lower than $9-$10 and has a very strong chance, with a lot of rationale behind it, to move up to $15-$16. Enter under $11 and price target is $15.

Simplistically, I am looking for value to hedge against the lofty valuations we are currently seeing and I am strengthening my positions in those that the fundamental reasons why I bought in the first place have not changed.